Nature-based solutions are potentially powerful responses to the environmental crisis. But what kind of power do we envision for these solutions, and with what consequences? In this blogpost, I discuss some of the problems with thinking of nature-based solutions as a tool to control nature, rather than as a pathway for establishing new ways of living with Earth’s complexity, in all its beauty and wild unpredictability.
Nature-based Solutions and the limits of control
There is now no doubt that we are living in extraordinary times. The human influence on the Earth’s systems has reached a point at which it (through extreme drought and rainfall, wildfires, flooding, wind storms) is itself exerting a significant influence on human lives. It seems a good time to be asking whether we are doing the ‘right’ sorts of things to remedy our degraded natural environments and cope with our changing climate. Moving away from technocratic or ‘engineered’ solutions towards more ‘nature-based solutions’ seems the right way to go but is it appropriate to do so under the assumption that such solutions ‘fix the problem’ and ensure sustainability into the future?
Questioning the ‘nature’ of ‘solutions’
What really makes nature-based solutions ‘nature-based’ [1]? And can they really deal with the complex and multiple problems (CO2 in the atmosphere, flood risk, biodiversity loss, social inequality) to which we need a solution? What if a ‘nature-based solution’ in any one particular place offers us a solution to any one of those problems but not all? Which do we prioritise? And does that then compromise any possible solution to one of the other problems? Do we even know what all the problems of the future are likely to be?
The notion of a ‘solution’ seems to me to be premised on the assumption that we can be in control of — and use — ‘nature’ in some predictable way. We are seeing ourselves as the agents who remain in control. We have now accepted that many so-called ‘grey’ or ‘tech’ solutions often cause more problems than they solve [2], but are we really now saying that our further manipulation of the environment albeit by ‘using nature’ is the ‘solution’ to our problems? I cannot help but feel that we are distracting ourselves from a more fundamental issue that we find difficult to face…
The truth is that our environmental systems are immensely complex and took some 3.7 billion years of evolution of life on planet Earth to form. It is quite astonishing that, even in the midst of all the manifestations of the complexity of those systems (weather extremes, biodiversity loss, environmental degradation, etc.), we still seem to cling onto our illusion that we can command our environment, the nature that we see as external to us, in such a way that we can direct its future.
Controlling Storm Eowyn?
And it is not as though we have not witnessed unprecedented and unpredictable heat waves, wildfires, and storms across the globe over the past years. Here in Ireland, storm Eowyn of the 24th of January this year has been estimated to be costing the insurance industry over €240 million, the greatest single storm damage insurance claims total in the history of the Irish state.
I am a coastal geomorphologist, so I ask myself: What kind of a ‘nature-based solution’ would protect coastal areas from the coastal erosion and flooding events like this can cause? Well, here’s the thing: damage from coastal erosion and flooding seems to occur only where development has been allowed to infringe on the natural coastal buffer zone [3]. This is not a human-designed ‘solution’ but simply the coast left to its own devices. Wherever the natural coastal zone had been left intact, we may see a re-distribution of sediment. Erosion in one place, deposition in another. That is the coast’s resilient response to the impact of a storm.
Coastal ecosystems have been surviving in this context for millions of years. We benefit from a wide coastal zone [4]. Where there is sufficient sand, beaches respond to storms by adjusting their profile to a flatter one better able to reduce wave energy. In this way they protect whatever lies landward of them from wave impact. In the same way, coastal wetlands reduce wave energy during storms. For this to happen, however, we have to accept that the coast needs space for wide beaches and wetlands to exist.
Less mastery, more complexity
Giving nature space and not interfering in the erosion, transport, and deposition of sediment, is ‘all’ we have to do. What precisely nature does with the space we give it is a function of many complex processes, their timing and their interaction. But if we allow nature to function in the way it does best, without us trying to control it, we will always derive a multitude of benefits from it.
Looking south across the tidal flats from North Bull Island in Dublin Bay (Source: Iris Moeller).
Looking north from North Bull Island in Dublin Bay towards the residential homes protected by expansive tidal flats (Source: Iris Moeller)
In the Naturescapes project, we are building and widely sharing coastal process knowledge to empower local communities to appreciate, visualise, and ultimately safeguard the relative nature-based protection provided by the space between tidal high and low water. Our research works through some of the contradictions that come with thinking of nature as a solution to humanity’s problems. We believe doing this will help build initiatives that can respond to the climate crises in an effective and just way.
Footnotes
[1] de Oliveira, F.L., 2025. Nature in nature-based solutions in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 256, p.105282.
[2] Morris, R.L., Konlechner, T.M., Ghisalberti, M. and Swearer, S.E., 2018. From grey to green: Efficacy of eco‐engineering solutions for nature‐based coastal defence. Global change biology, 24(5), pp.1827–1842.
[3] Dong, W.S., Ismailluddin, A., Yun, L.S., Ariffin, E.H., Saengsupavanich, C., Maulud, K.N.A., Ramli, M.Z., Miskon, M.F., Jeofry, M.H., Mohamed, J. and Mohd, F.A., 2024. The impact of climate change on coastal erosion in Southeast Asia and the compelling need to establish robust adaptation strategies. Heliyon, 10(4).
[4] Kallesøe, M.F., Bambaradeniya, C., Iftikhar, U.A., Ranasinghe, T. and Miththapala, S., 2008. Linking Coastal Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. IUCN, Colombo, 4.
Author: Iris Moeller
Iris is Professor of Geography (1966) and Head of Discipline in the School of Natural Sciences at Trinity College Dublin. Her research focuses on the physical processes that determine the ability of dynamic coasts and particularly coastal wetlands to buffer wave and tidal energy. She loves the awe-inspiring complexity of nature and our place within it — but also baking bread, running and philosophising with her son, Josh, whose thoughts also inspired this piece.
More reads
If you’re interested in learning more, check out these links:
https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/08/23/the-limits-to-human-domination-of-nature/